Tech and AI'Was 1995 30 years ago?' Google's AI overviews is...

‘Was 1995 30 years ago?’ Google’s AI overviews is having issues with a simple question

-


In the year 2025, it seems we’re hearing frequent warnings about impending doom via artificial intelligence. And that’s not without some merit: Heck, AI is causing job loss and filling our social feeds with fairly convincing slop.

But sometimes, the world sends a reminder that our AI tools are a far cry from Schwarzeneggerian domination. For instance, Google’s much-maligned AI Overviews is, at times, struggling to decipher if 1995 was, in fact, 30 years ago. For the mathematically challenged, yes it was, because, well, 2025 minus 1995 equals 30. But don’t go telling that to Google.

People online noticed Google’s AI Overviews seemed to have trouble with this particular query. It became almost a trend of sorts to ask, “Was 1995 30 years ago?” Lots of people posted screenshots appearing to show Google answering with incorrect answers — typically speaking, AI Overviews decided 1995 was 29 years ago, for some reason.

We tested the query at Mashable, and did — at least sometimes — replicate the results of these screenshots and get an incorrect answer from Google’s AI Overviews

Mashable Light Speed

Here is a screenshot from a Mashable editor.

screenshot of google answering was 1995 30 years ago wrong


Credit: Mashable / Screenshot: Google

When I tried to recreate the results, Google, at first, correctly answered the question. But later, it answered both incorrectly and correctly. The AI Overview spat out a garbled response that said 1995 was both 29 years ago and 30 years ago. Mashable has reached out to Google for comment and will update as necessary.

google both incorrectly and correctly answering was 1995 30 years ago


Credit: Mashable / Screenshot: Google

We’ve covered Google’s often confidently wrong AI Overviews at Mashable. There was that trend where it would invent meaning for any made-up idiom. Or when it struggled to get the year right. Or the time it got the NFL rules wrong during a high-profile game, causing a lot of confusion.

Despite these repeated issues and mistakes, Google continues to feed users more AI Overviews. Remember to double-check your sources…or maybe just break out your calculator.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

What is the FOCIL Framework? Solution To Reinforce Ethereum’s Impartiality

Ethereum has been fighting transaction censorship, and its co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, may have just found the solution: the...

SOL and SUI to Outshine ETH and BTC in 2025 Cycle

Real Vision co-founder Raoul Pal has stirred debate after sharing his thesis on the current market cycle. According to...

Bitcoin up, MicroStrategy down over past 30 days

Bitcoin ironically dipped below $94K during the firework-filled climax to MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor’s “$100K” New Year’s Eve...

This ‘Lethal Trifecta’ Can Trick AI Browsers Into Stealing Your Data

AI browsers have a critical flaw: They can’t tell safe commands from malicious text. Patches help, but guardrails...

Advertisement

PENGU Drops 8% Daily But Analyst Sees 200% Pump Next

TL;DR Pudgy Penguins dipped 8% to $0.032 today, yet analysts eye a bullish breakout above $0.036. Rising volume signals strong...

Telegram snitched on 2,000 users to US authorities in 2024, report

Last year, Telegram complied with 900 US requests, affecting 2,253 users. However, only 14 of these requests came...

Must read

What is the FOCIL Framework? Solution To Reinforce Ethereum’s Impartiality

Ethereum has been fighting transaction censorship, and its...

SOL and SUI to Outshine ETH and BTC in 2025 Cycle

Real Vision co-founder Raoul Pal has stirred debate...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you